CRM cannot control production if it does not reflect production truth.
Orders get lost between sales, prepress, print, postpress and logistics when statuses, tech cards and QC gates are not defined.
Workflow optimization
Print production workflow, CRM and ERP logic that reflects real shop-floor control.
A workflow audit for owners who need production statuses, tech cards, QC gates and reporting to match what actually happens between sales, prepress, print and delivery.
- Production status model
- Tech cards and QC gates
- Owner dashboard requirements
What gets checked on the floor
- Business context
- Equipment
- File / prepress
- RIP / profile
What you receive
- Audit report
- Risk map
- Root-cause map
- Acceptance checklist
- Technical findings
How it runs
Facts first, then the decision.
- 01 Diagnostic call
- 02 Data collection
- 03 Technical review
- 04 Report
- 05 Action plan
Report fragment Evidence / action plan
Machine readiness 68/100 RIP / profile risk Critical Material compatibility Medium Workflow gap High Scope boundaryNo vendor ties
What is not included
- Generic CRM implementation detached from shop-floor reality
- Accounting or tax configuration
- Large software rebuild without process diagnosis
- Owner dashboard promises without production data discipline
FAQ
Do you implement software?
Only when the software logic is grounded in real production statuses and QC gates.
Can this work with existing CRM?
Yes. The first task is to map production truth before choosing whether to adapt or replace systems.
Related
If the problem is wider than one service, start here.
Send the case
Build controlled print workflow
Describe the machine, material, symptom, business risk and urgency. I will classify whether this is an equipment, RIP/color, workflow or vendor-risk case.